Home | Cyber Crime | Is Your Instant Messaging Secure?

Is Your Instant Messaging Secure?

Font size: Decrease font Enlarge font
image Avoid giving out private information

Not all of the instant messaging providers are ensuring complete encryption of the communication exchanges between their users, according to a recent survey conducted by CNET.com, a technology-oriented website.

Share

The survey respondents were: AOL AIM, AOL ICQ, Facebook Chat, Google Talk, IBM Lotus Sametime, Microsoft Windows Live Messenger, Skype and Yahoo Messenger.

One of the 10 questions asked in the survey pertained to a ‘yes or no’ query on whether the IM provider shields its users from eavesdropping. The survey found that complete encryption was provided only by the following providers: Google Talk, Lotus Sametime from IBM, AOL Instant Messenger and Skype. 

The other systems provided only partial security, mostly in assuring secure log-ins (except Facebook Chat). This implies that after an instant messaging connection has been established the conversation that follows is not protected.

The importance of encryption cannot be overstated. In the case of people who have open wireless Internet, an eavesdropper can easily intercept their unencrypted instant messages by using dSniff or similar software which can be downloaded for free.

Police authorities may intercept without difficulty and decode unencrypted instant messaging chats with the use of software sold by WildPackets. This is usually done in wiretap conditions and could include VoIP calls and e-mail.

CNET emphasizes the point that while encryption is crucial, there is no guarantee that it is sufficient. There is the possibility that the encryption system can be compromised because of a poorly constructed algorithm, for example, or errors in implementation. On the other hand, having encryption is much better than having none at all.

Facebook Chat was included in the survey. The company, however, refused to participate whereas all the other companies gave answers to the 10 questions without making a big fuss. The survey team reported that as far as they could determine, Facebook Chat did not provide security for logging in (implying that a competent eavesdropper glean a user’s password) and for the conversations.

The survey respondents also assured that they do not keep content logs of their users’ IM communications. Some of them kept records of user log-ins, but these were stored for a limited time only.

Safety Tips:

* Avoid giving out private information like passwords and credit card data on instant messages.
* Remember strangers you meet online are not necessarily the persons they say they are.
* Provide no data in your IM online profile; if the system requires you to fill in data, it is best to place fictitious data.
* Use a different password to your IM system from the password to your system or e-mail.
* Do not allow automatic downloads.

Rate this article:
4.00
  • email Email to a friend
  • print Print version
  • Plain text Plain text

Comments (10 posted):

on 06/20/08 09:24:18
avatar
Thanks for great tips.
wholesale list on 04/11/11 06:28:23
avatar
Surely No ...
There are hackers for doing these illegal activities & the worst thing is that they get the nice package for the same work ...
marathon runners on 05/30/11 09:28:30
avatar
In order to avoid identity theft, people should avoid giving out private information.
web design company on 09/08/11 05:42:04
avatar
Great info dude !! Thanks a lot for sharing !!
GUCCI on 09/25/11 02:56:14
avatar
Having found your blog,I feel happy.I write my short comment on this article . It is awesome. The information in this post is very useful and it is a mind blowing article. I thank you again.
buy essay on 10/05/11 06:41:37
avatar
That is some inspirational stuff. Never knew that opinions could be this varied. Thanks for all the enthusiasm to offer such helpful information here.
carpet cleaners on 11/04/11 08:41:16
avatar
First I must tell you we appreciate the great and informative entry.Need to admit that I never learned about this review, I noticed many new facts, in my opinion. God bless you for sharing this information useful and interesting and I also will probably anticipate other interesting posts you closer to the inside future.keep.
security software on 11/26/11 04:47:32
avatar
So if encryption is not sufficient anymore, what is there else to do in order to maintain full privacy? I guess there is nothing indeed. After all, things can`t be that bad since we really have nothing to hide. The worst part starts when we end up infecting our system with some virus we can`t get rid of, which is why we should care more about ensuring the right security features to our system.
Perry Belcher on 12/11/11 11:29:14
avatar
It`s interesting that Facebook did not want to participate in this survey, I am sure they have something to hide or their programmers simply did not think to encrypt data for logging in or conversations. I am curious if Google Talk or conversations from Google+ are encrypted because it`s their job to protect their users confidential information.
Web Design Company on 01/23/12 01:09:04
avatar
This is very good question. There should be instant messaging security but looking on the situation i think nothing is safe on the web. This or that way one could try to harm you. Thanks for one more nice advice.

Post your comment comment

Please enter the code you see in the image:

Access restricted articles free
TheSafetyChannel
To show your safety related video, Contact Us.
Protecting public health through food safety and defence.
What Simon says about...


Monthly Newsletter
Email:
Supporting SafetyIssues
If you support this website, please consider making a donation and help us continue providing this free service.
Please consider making a donation
Tags
No tags for this article