![]()
|
Volume 2 Issue 15 February 2003 |
||
|
Two female students in an
Alaska high school are caught passing notes about how they will kill
specific fellow students and teachers. Other documents in the girls’ homes
and lockers detail who will be slaughtered, how they will be killed, when
and even where.
A kindergartener punches a pregnant teacher in the stomach almost causing her to lose her baby. An 8-year old pupil of a Maryland elementary school has a detailed plan to burn down his school including where to pour the gasoline to do the most damage and kill the most people. And, a pervert with a knife sneaks into the female locker room of a high school to abduct a student.
School has become a dangerous
place.
The danger is coming from a variety of sources. |
|
||
|
|
A student or teacher calls the number and – without giving his or her name – tells of a potential danger in school such a student carrying a gun in his backpack. School officials check out the student and his backpack. If no weapon is found then no harm is done. If a weapon is found though, a school disaster may have been prevented and a troubled child will get the help he needs to avoid being a killer.
Character instruction is an old fashioned way to combat school violence. If you are old enough, you may remember old school readers with stories stressing right and wrong – specific character traits. This type of instruction has fallen out of favor largely due to fear that it was bringing together church and state in our schools. Identification tags are a good way to know who is in a school and what are they doing there. The best identification tags incorporate pictures of the persons allowed in the school whether staff, students or visitors. |
||
|
|
Who wants to sneak into
schools? Gang members recruiting new gang members from the student body. In conjunction with identification methods, many schools are mandating school uniforms for students. While this might seem a violation of student freedom of expression, the requiring of school uniforms has two good purposes. School uniforms allow the spotting of strangers – such as non student gang members trying to recruit – very easily. Uniforms also prevent gang violence in school by not allowing students to wear so called gang colors which can start fights between rival gangs in school. This may seem an infringement on student expression but what is more important – a minor expression of student individuality or student lives? |
||
|
Fencing and locked doors are another way schools are keeping students safe. Everyone enters and leaves school through one door – giving control over who gets into a school. This can get expensive but how much is a child’s life worth? Many schools now have police officers patrolling the school inside and out. Schools have had security guards for decades in certain areas but police can carry weapons and deal with criminals on the spot while guards usually do not carry weapons as they are not trained in their use and have to hold violators for police.
Security cameras are watching students and others in hallways as well as the exteriors of classrooms. With students wearing uniforms and students and staff wearing photo identification tags, those watching security cameras can easily identify people who do not belong in a school as well as spot problems. Now, this method can be taken too far. A few years ago, workmen at a Chicago suburban junior college found a security camera in the bathroom of a college building. In another school, workers installing a clock found a security camera in the teachers’ lounge. Both actions are a clear violation of personal privacy so before cameras are installed, schools need to create policies of how and where security cameras can be used in school.
And, schools are creating characteristics of violent students. The other name for this method is violence profiling. Profiling has gotten a bad reputation with police largely because it is used incorrectly. The wrong way to use profiling is to assume that just because a certain group of people may statistically be most likely to commit a certain crime, police should focus on that group to prevent members of the group from committing that crime.
The right way to use profiling is without ethnic or racial prejudices. School administrators can have psychological experts create a profile of potentially violent students and distribute that profile to staff and teachers. If a student displays characteristics in the profile, staff or teachers should bring the student to the attention of his or her parents and school experts who can help determine if the student needs help and, if so, what type of help. The profile should not panic a teacher into believing that a student displaying certain characteristics is a potential killer who will soon wipe out the teacher and her class.
Those are some of the basic methods schools across the nation are using to keep staff and students safe.
In future articles on
Safety Issues, we will tell you about specific methods and technologies schools are using to prevent violence. |
|||
|
This column is published each weekday by Safety Issues to help you live a safer life. Please email us column ideas and questions. Neither Safety Issues nor its
affiliated companies are responsible for any opinions expressed in this
column. Thank
you for reading this column. © 2008 SafetyIssues.com All rights reserved National Center for Missing Children |
|||